It's tempting, especially early on, to pitch every brand that seems even loosely relevant. More outreach feels like more opportunity. In practice it's the opposite โ a wave of generic pitches to weakly-matched brands trains those contacts to ignore the next email too, and it burns hours that could've gone into fewer, sharper pitches to brands that actually make sense.
So before any brand gets a pitch, it has to survive one rule: don't pitch a brand just because it exists. Every opportunity has to answer five questions first.
A skincare creator gets pitched to a home-goods brand because "they seemed cool." There's no product overlap, no audience overlap, and no actual campaign idea โ just a hopeful email. Even a perfectly written version of this pitch is unlikely to land, because the fit was never really there.
A fitness creator who regularly posts meal-prep content gets pitched to a brand that just launched a new protein product line. The brand is running an active campaign looking for exactly this kind of content, the creator's audience is already primed for it, and the pitch can point to a specific product and a specific content idea. This is a pitch that has a real reason to exist before a single word gets written.
The point of the filter isn't to slow managers down โ it's to make sure the time spent writing and following up goes toward brands that were actually worth the effort in the first place. A shorter list of well-matched brands will always outperform a long list of maybes.